Thursday, 4 April 2013

The concept of 'Uhuru' in A Grain of Wheat


Name: Joshi Toral
Paper: 2 The African Literature

Topic:The concept of 'Uhuru' in A Grain of Wheat

SEM: 4,

M.A. part 2.
Year: 2012


Submitted to,
Dr.Dilip Barad,
M.K Bhavnagar University,
Bhavnagar
Introduction
A Grain of Wheat is Ngugi wa Thiong’o’s third novel, and marks a significant turn in his literary production, as a Marxist and Favonian militant attitude replaces the liberal Christians of his first works.  The action of the novel focuses on the protagonists’ remembrances of the ‘Mau Mau’ Revolt, which Ngugi sees as the only historical moment which allows “the space to imagine the birth of a new Kenya”.
The way these events are recounted and reshaped is a collective one, as a shifting focalization and a complex time structure create a polyphonic, choral-narrative that shows in detail the physical, psychological and political impact of Revolt on individuals living in a small community.
The novel pivots on the transitional point of Kenya’s independence on 12 December 1963, beginning with the last four day of Kenya under colonial rule and reaching its narrative peak on the very day of “Uhuru”?
Ø Meaning of “Uhuru”:
Meaning of ‘Uhuru’ means a ‘Freedom’ .Ngugi’s choice not to translate this term is significant, as in the novel the definition of the actual meaning if Uhuru is an open political and social question: the new Kenyan bourgeoisie sees it indeed as the possibility to replace the colonizer without changing the existing social, political and economical structure, whereas for Gikuyu peasants Uhuru means a profound break with the colonial past, a rebirth which has to bring about the restitution of the lands usurped by the white settles and the eradication of the poverty. The meaning of Uhuru is thus a central question, quite far from being obvious; so much so that Ngugi clarifies what Uhuru should be only in the 1986 version of the novel.

The former “Mau Mau” guerilla General R.Staes in his Independence speech.

“We get Uhuru today. But what’s the meaning of ‘Uhuru’? It is contained in the name of our movement: Land and Freedom”.
The whole novel can indeed be summarized as a collective act of recalling and reflecting on the events leading Uhuru, in order to understand what actual meaning it could have for Thabai peasants. It is precisely in the past that ‘ A Grain of Wheat’ constructs a narration of the nation: the pedagogic moment materializes in a prerogative moment disseminated in lots of narratives, each of which is a speech act.
“The narration becomes therefore an active construction of the past, an act of writing, in the sense of modeling.”
The novel dissipates this celebratory mood by representing and re-examining the hurts from the past: the wreckages brought out by the Mau Mau rebellion-disloyalties and betrayals, broken from the suppressed memories to haunt the present.
“The idea of a sociological organism moving cylindrically through homogeneous, empty time is a price analogical of the idea of the nation”.
The novel is about how the villagers of a Gikuyu village, Thabai, are busy preparing for their,
“Uhuru Celebrations”
That would be held on Kenya’s Independence Day. To commemorate this significant day that signals Kenya’s “freedom”, the village of Thabai decide to prepare a public honoring of their village hero, Kihika, a Mau Mau rebel who sacrificed his life to fight for Kenya’s freedom during the Mau Mau rebellion.
Throughout A Grain godhead, the Thabai villagers are indeed seen to be hailed seen to be hailed by this call of a ‘Nation’. As part of the efforts to persuade the “hermit” Mugo to lead Thabai’s Uhuru celebration, warui one of the representative sent by the Thabai villagers to visit.
Mugo says:
“We of Thabai village must also dance our part”
The construction of the nation in A Grain of Wheat is explicitly represented as a narration, a linguistic act; indeed most of the events of the Revolt are not related directly, but refracted through the conscience of its heroes and heroines: it is their narration which is represented, and it is through their narration that those historical events are relived, following a narrative strategy typical of or a true.
“Every significant development either consists of or turns on acts of speech or their absence”.
The events are evoked and put one beside the other as mosaic teasers through the heroes’ dialogues, confessions and free indirect style monologues. Most of the action actually consists of.
“An intricate network of speech-acts performed and unperformed, acknowledged and unacknowledged”.
“A great deal of it centers on bringing ergon into proper relation with logos”
“Creating instability about what is know and what it means to know”
Ngugi’s literary representation of the Mau Mau rebellion in this novel A Grain of Wheat (1967). Ngugi’s Trans gression of the boundary between historic and literary writing has led to his failure as a writer, I argue that as “a literary-historical artist.
The moment of independence, the novel attempts to explore both the past the Mau Mau rebellion and the possible future it brings to Kenyans. The meaning of “independence” to question the meaning of “freedom”. That dramatization of the “disillusionment of the moment of independence”, Ngugi has represented the crisis.

Mass Communication and Media Studies


                     Name: Joshi Toral
Paper: 3 Mass Communication and Media Studies

Topic:do the media make or mar the socity

SEM: 4,

M.A. part 2.
Year: 2012


Submitted to,
Dr.Dilip Barad,
M.K Bhavnagar University,
Bhavnagar
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           How does mass media influence society?"

Society is influenced by the media in so many ways. As this is media (medium) for the masses it helps them get information about a lot of things and also to form opinions and make judgment regarding so many issues. It is the media which keeps the people updated and informed about whets happening around them and the world. Everyone can draw something from it.


Media also limits peoples thinking capacity although it projects lot of ideas and views of people from different streams of life. This affects the youth in the society who lack in experience and sometimes blindly believe in what they listen to. And many times the news covered are over exaggerated and it seldom concentrates on the area which needs real attention. By doing so it diverts the society’s attention away from the actual problem. Media should do just to their job and are responsible for the development of the society at the same time expressing the right news with the right content.

It is impossible for someone to go through their whole live without seeing mass media all around us, whether it is seeing a billboard high above the highway with a girl wearing nothing but her jeans or a magazine being sold on the roadside with a brand new sports car on the cover.   Mass media communication is defined as “the process of creating shared meaning between the mass media and their audience” (Phelan, 2010).   Mass media can be influential in many different ways to many different people, and throughout this paper I will be looking at some of the ways it can influence people’s lives.
   
Commercials are where most broadcasting companies make their money, and with the outset of internet and websites one might assume that there is more money from advertising on the World Wide Web.   What Jamhouri and Winners (2009) in The Enduring Influence of TV Advertising and Communications Clout Patterns in the Global Marketplace try to prove is that television advertising has the same amount of influence as it always has, even while digital media continues to grow.
In the last five decades or so, the media and its influence on the societies, has grown exponentially with the advance of technology.  First there was the telegraph and the post offices, then the radio, the newspaper, magazines, television and now the internet and the new media including palmtops, cell phones etc. There are positive and negative influences of mass media, which we must understand as a responsible person of a society.
Mass media make or mar society….
The mass media; they are providing news/information, entertainment and education. The first and foremost function of the media in a society is to provide news and information to the masses, that is why the present era is some time termed as the information age as well. People need news/information for various reasons, on one hand it can be used to socialize and on the other to make decisions and formulate opinions. Entertainment would be the other function of the mass media where it is mostly used by the masses to amuse them in present day hectic environment.
                   Educating the masses about their rights, moral, social and religious obligations is another important function of mass media, which needs no emphasis.
In our work we usually know what we have to do, base on our experience and studies, however on our routine life and house hold chores we mostly rely on the mass media to get the current -news and facts about what is important and what we should be aware of.
People have put our trust on the media as an authority to give us news, entertainment and education. However, the influence of mass media on our kids, teenagers and society is so big that we should know how it really works. The media makes billions of dollars with the advertising they sell and that we are exposed to, every single moment. We buy what we are told to buy by the media. After seeing thousands of advertising we make our buying decisions based on what we saw on TV, newspapers or magazines.
 These are the effects of mass media especially in teenagers, they buy what they see on TV, what their favorite celebrity advertise and what is acceptable by society based on the fashion that the media has imposed on them.
·       Positive and negative influences in young people
Ø Positive influence in society,
      If there is a quiz show on education that is getting a lot of attention by the media and gains popularity among your friends and society, you will more likely want to actively participate and watch these quiz shows. These activities are good for the society and will promote literary activities in the youth.
Ø Negative influence in society,
However a negative influence in teenagers is the use of guns and ammunition by celebrity movie stars, the constant exposure of which would seduce the teen to replicate the same behavior in the real life. When we watch TV or an action movie we usually see many images of violence and people hurting others.
The problem with this is that it can become traumatic especially in our children as they see it more and more. Our kids that are starting to grow and are shaping their personality values and beliefs can become aggressive or they can lose a sense of distinction between reality and fiction.
Another problem is that real war is used as a form of entertainment by the media, we should make our kids and teen aware that war is not a form of entertainment and that there is no win or lose like in video games, in real war everyone lose.
Teens, youngsters are in a stage of life where they want to be accepted by their peers, they want to be loved and be successful. The media creates the ideal image of beautiful men and women with all the ingredients of a successful person, you can see it in movies and TV. It’s a subliminal way to persuade the masses that if you want to be successful and look like them then you have to buy that particular brand or product.
 Another negative influence in teenagers, especially in the USA, that has grown over the last years is obesity. There are millions of adolescents fighting obesity, but at the same time they are exposed to thousands of advertisements of junk food, while the ideal image of a successful person is told to be thin and wealthy.
The media has a huge impact on society in shaping the public opinion of the masses. They can form or modify the public opinion in different ways depending of what is the objective.
For example, Pakistani media influenced the public opinion against the Taliban in Swat by repeated telecast of a video clip showing whipping of a woman by a Taliban.
Before that the public opinion over the military action against the Taliban in Swat was divided, but repeated telecast of this short video clip changed the public opinion over night in the favor of the government to take action.
Other ways to influence are with polls and trends, especially in political campaigns. The candidates that can pay for more TV and media exposure have more influence on public opinion and thus can receive more votes.

Wednesday, 3 April 2013

"Hardy's portrayal of women character" in his novels



Name: Joshi Toral
Paper: 5 Thomas Hardy as a novelist 

Topic:"Hardy's portrayal of women character" in his novels

SEM: 4,

M.A. part 2.
Year: 2012


Submitted to,
Dr.Dilip Barad,
M.K Bhavnagar University,
Bhavnagar



Introduction:

          Hardy is a remarkable twentieth-century poet as well as a nineteenth-century novelist. He was writer nature in his novel more. In his the Wessex novel are gallery of women portraits. The important women figure can be divided into groups.
          In this we took about his five novels is….
  
          1 Tess of the D’ Urbervilles.
          2 The Return of the Native.
          3 The Mayor of Caster Bride.
          4 Two on a Tower.
          5 The Well Beloved.
         
          In these novels Hardy has portrait women as an object. He is a ported women and the low in Victorian England.

          This “Victorian dichotomy” is a moral and intellectual construct or generalization that was created largely by males without much reference to human realities to say that any women who is not chaste must be depraved is to put half of the human creation into just two categories and this must be a gross over simplification.

          Probably Hardy’s must challenging rejection of his dichotomy was to give “Tess of the D’ Urbervilles the sub-title”, “A Pure Women”.

          Hear Hardy trying to make is that Tess is essentially pure and innocent, despite the fact that she has been exploded and abused by Alec. In this novel Angel seems to regard her in this way, and the irony of this situation is that he himself had a sexual relationship outside marriage. From his point of view there is one low for a woman, another for a man.

“The Return of the Native” Eustain Vye combines the strength of a man with the beauty of a woman. Like the health, Eustacia is untamable, dark and wild. The Victorian ideas displayed in Eustacia’s feminine desires conflicts with this masculinity.

“She had the passions and instincts which make a model goddess that is those which make not quite a model woman” (Ch xi)”

The women characters in the novels of Thomas Hardy:-  

(1)        Tess of the D Urbervilles:-


Ø Tess

         Tess was the eldest of the Durbeyfield family, between her mother and Tess, with her nation school education, lay a gap of two hundred years, that between the Jacobean and the Victorian ages. Thu both have their thinking is also different to each other. Tess never ague with her mother diction.

“ {… } Quite a Malthusian towards her mother for thoughtlessly giving her so many little sisters and brothers when it was such a trouble to nurse and provide for them.”

          Tess thinking about and help her family, she went to work, as soon as she left school on near by farms hay making, harvesting and preferably, milking and butter- making like at her home.
          Tess overcame her reluctance to go after forming an unfavorable impression of a
Alac D’Urbevilles.

          “She was a fine and handsome girl-not handsome than some other possibly-but her mobile peony mouth and large innocent eyes added eloquence to color and shape.
She was a red ribbon in her hair…”

          “It would always be summer and autumn, and you always courting me, and always thinking as much of me as you have done through the past summer-time”

          Tess never listens her mother advice. And she despite her mother’s advice. Tess has to tell the truth. She wrote to Angel, but the letter she slipped under his door was thrust under the carpet, and he did not see it.
          Angels’s love was so ideal and that his Victorianism so engrained that he could not compromise when Tess urged him to forgive her.

          “Forgive me as you are forgiven! I forgive you, Angel’
O Tess, forgiveness dose not apply to the case! You were one person, now you are another, My God- how cal forgiveness meet such a grotesque- prestidigitation as that {…} I repeat, the women I have been loving is not you. Another woman in your shape.”

His idealized Tess was ‘dead’ and separation followed almost inevitably.’ Where a woman of the world might have provided, Tess accepted his decision ‘as her deserts’ she ‘sought not her’ own, was not provoked. Though no evil of his treatment of her’

‘Once victim, always victim’
          
“Justice was done and the president of the Immortals, in Aeschylean phrase had ended his sport with Tess” 

Hardy’s giving sub-title “A Pure Woman”, to Tess aroused great controversy among Victorians. To Hardy, it had nothing to do with purity in the narrow moral sense. Purity is of the spirit, and with a spiritual reference. She is not almost but absolutely pure. Whether morality is of mind or of the hard or both there cannot be two reputable opinions about Tess’s morals.

“She has an attribute which caused D’Urberville’s eyes to rivet themselves upon her. It was luxuriousness of aspect, a fullness of growth, which made her appear more of a woman than she really was.”


(2.) The Return of the Native:-

Ø Eustacia Vye:-

A girl of nineteen, she lived with her grandfather captain Vye at Mistover Knap.
She was the daughter of a cordite band master at Badmouth, and well educated. When her parents died she was live in Eldon, and dreaming of a glamorous life at Budmouth or else where.
         
“Eustacia Vye was the raw material of a divinity}
She has the passions and instincts which make a model goddess that is those which make not quite make a model woman. To see her hair was to fancy that a whole winter did not contain darkness enough to from its shadow. She has pagan eyes, full of nocturnal mysteries. Her moods recalled lotus-eaters her motions the ebb and flow of the sea her voice, the viola. To be loved to madness such was her great desire.”

          Hear Hardy portrayal beauty of woman and also her desire. The darkness in which she is introduced on rainbarrow is in harmony with her lot. The telescope and hour gloss which she often carried suggest ‘The desire of something a far’ Clym’s return from Paris was like a man caring from heaven.

“A young and claver man was coming into that lonely heath from, of all contrasting place in the world, Paris. It was like a man coming from heaven.”

          When he spoke to her, her perfervid imagination produced ‘a cycle of visions’. The captain suggested that reading had filled her head with much ‘romantic-non-sense’.

“If Miss Eustacia had less romantic nonsense in her head it would be better for her”

          She wanted “life music poetry, passions, war and all the beating of pulsing that is going on in the great arteries of the world.” In a moment of tragic decision, shortly before her death.

“Still in death the expression of her finely carved mouth was pleasant external rigidity had seized upon it in momentary transition between fervor and resignation”

          Eustacia fails to understand, dose not even try to understand that her own frantic quest for the homeland after heart’s desire live.


(3)The Mayer of Casterbridge:-

Ø Elizabeth- Jane

          Elizabeth Jane was the child of Michael Henchard and Susan, when Henchard sold his wife at Weydon- Priors. She took Elizabeth -Jane with her and emigrated to Canada with Newson. The child died three months after the sale. She is a part of the tragic irony of the story, and also he did not discover that she was Newson’s daughter until after Susan’s death.

“Appeared as a well-formed young woman of eighteen, completely possessed of that ephemeral precious essence youth, which is itself beauty, irrespective of complexion or contour”
          She was almost look-like of her mother, Susan. Hardy writes:

“A glance was sufficient to inform the eye that this was Susan Henchard’s
Grown-up daughter her former spring-like specialties were transferred so dexterously by time to the second figure, her child-

          She was devoted to mother and showed a strong respectable complex.

          This revolution of her mind on her first appearance in the novel, particularly the last sentence in the passage quire above, agrees well with her conclusive feeling much quoted to illustrate Hardy’s thought.

          “Happiness is an occasional episode in the general drama of pain”

And also Elizabeth Jane also says..

“She has a more important narrative function, dependent on her being placed naturally at the center of a web of characters, Susan, Henchard, Farfrae and Lucetta.”

          In this novel we can sys that woman not thickening beyond is limited but at that time mad do what ever they do in his life. And also man use woman as a object in his life.


(4)Two on a Tower;

Ø Lady Viviette Constantine:-

Viviette is a refined Eustacia with incoherent aspirations. She scarcely attracts us at first but succeeds eventually in winning our sympathy. She had unhappy married to Sir Blount Constantine.

          “There was an appearance visits her of confidence on lady Constantine’s face. She wore a heavy dress of velvet and lace, and being –the only person in the spacious apartment she looked small and isolated the soft dark eyes large, and melancholy by circumstances for more than by quality were the natural indices of a warm and affectionate, perhaps slightly voluptuous temperament languishinf for what of something to do, childish or suffer Clinical correlation & further evaluation.”
         
In this novel we see that Viviette is not happy with her married life. And also she was live alone in the society. Now women are suffer in the softy Hardy produce her with this character.

(5)The Well Beloved
Ø The Three Avice

(I)           Avice caro- the first grand mother.
(II)          Anne Avice – the second, mother.
(III)        Avice Pierston- The third.

The pursuit of the well Beloved and The Well Beloved, the central figure,
Jocelyn-Pierston is men obsessed both with the search for his ideal woman and with sculpting the perfect figure of a naked Aphrodite.
         
          The first of the three Avices with who Pierston through he was in love, was a girl of seventeen or eighteen with brown hair and bright hazed eyes.
          Avice the second was a washer woman a daughter of.

“I have loved fifteen a ready! She tells him laughing and when he asked with a sinking heart, Am I one of them? She ponders critically before she replies. “You was; for a week”.

          He is not discouraged, he takes her to London and for short time she was his servant in Landon, where he proposed to her only to discover that she was secretly married at home.

“My mother’s, and my grand mother’s” said she, looking at him no longer as a possible husband, but as strange possiblised relic in human from and were you my great grandmother’ s too?”
         
          In this novel Hardy portrayal how woman is a change ignition but the. His can’ thickening meet a weal beloved in his life. May be he fail to see a thing in his life that’s why three jometion he can’t surch his beloved.
         

Conclusion
          A possible conclusion to be drawn from the forgoing facts is that Hardy’s heroines are characterized by a yielding to circumstances that is limited by the play of incident. They are never quite bad. These qualities in them which saves them from ever being very bad. They have an instinctive self-respect, and instinctive purity.
                  
          Hardy as woman character sees a life of society and also such thing to in thus society. And also see an uncommon woman. Beautiful and nature see also seas woman in society and also camper to nature and woman also. How both effect each other.



Character sketch Of BALARAM HALWAI



Name: Joshi Toral

Paper: 1 New Literature 

Topic: Character sketch Of BALARAM HALWAI: White Tiger by Arvind Adiga

SEM: 4,

M.A. part 2.
Year: 2012


Submitted to,
Dr.Dilip Barad,
M.K Bhavnagar University,
Bhavnagar



Introduction


          The White Tiger is the debut novel by Indian author Arvind Adiga. It was first published in 2008 and won the Man Booker prize in the same year. They provide a dark comical view of modern day life in India through the narration of is protagonist Balram Halwai. The novel is the contrast between India rise as a modern global economy and its working class people who live in crushing poverty. All so the novel touched on include the corruption end to India society and politics, familial loyalty versus independence, religious decisions between Hindu and Muslims.
                   There is evidence of white tiger is protagonist Balram’s nick name, which he earns by being deemed the smartest boy in his village by an education inspector. Balram is told that he his like a white tiger, a rare animal that is said to come only per generation.
About The Author:-
                   Arvind Aliga, 33, is the second youngest novelist to win the literary world’s most important fiction award-man booker prize. He is also the award’s fourth born winner, along with sir Salman Rushdie, Arundhati Roy and Kiran Desai.      
Balram Halwai:-
                   Balram Halwai is a poor Indian villager whose great ambition dead him to the zenith of Indian business culture, the world of the Bangalore entrepreneur.
                   The narrator Balram Halwai grew up in the fictive village Laxmangah in India. Like most families in this region in his family is very poor. He lost his parents very early. His family neither gave him a name nor a date of birth. They just called him “Munna” meaning “boy” (p.13) His father always wanted him to go to school to learn how to write and to read in reason to give him better possibilities.(P.28) At the school he got the name ”Balram” by his teacher. One of the most important facts the school inspector named him “The White Tiger”, “The rarest animal in the jungle (P.30) because he is the cleverest child in Laxmangarh.”
                   Balram suffer a lot because of his family and also we can say poverty. The land owner “stork” Balram’s family takes him out of the school of earn money in the tea house. His further education he gets by eaves drooping conversation of the tea house guests.
          After the death of his parents his grandmother Kusum decided about his future. Against all expectations he gets a job as driver and servant at the “storks” house. Hear we can say that how Balram’s life turn out to one side to other side. He was in village a tea sweeper and how he comes in city as a driver.
          Mr. Ashok point of view Balram is a young master and perfect servant. Balram identifies with his master and he’s really fortunate to have a boss like that. When he is forced to take his responsibility for an accident a used by Rinky madam he begins to mistrust and to about the loyalty of his master.
          There are early sings for the master of Mr. Ashok. First he can’t overcome his thoughts to murder his good-natured master but at the end it’s a cold blooded and well planed deed.
“They remain slaves because they can’t see what is beautiful in the world”.
           There fore he risks his families well being but he doesn’t feel responsible for them anyone. After Balram’s flight he founds a driver company with the stolen money of Mr. Ashok. This underlines his spirit, shrewdness and intelligence. When one of his drivers caused an accident he behaves loyal and supports his driver. His action shows the difference between him and Mr. Ashok during an accident. While Mr. Ashok wallows in self pity dear to as feels for sorry his driver and the victim.
           “It was very important tripe for me. White Mr. Ashok and Rinky madam were relaxing. I swam through the pond, walked up the hill. And entered the Black Fort for the time.  Putting my foot on the wall, I looked down on the village from there, my little Laxmangarh. I saw the temple- tower, the market, the glistening line of sewage, the landlord’s mansion and my own house, with that dark little cloud outside the water buffalo. It looked like most beautiful sight on earth. I learned out from the edge of the fort in the direction of my village and then I did something too disgusting to describe to you. Well actually I spat. Again and again and then whistling and humming I went back down the hill, I Eight months later, I said Mr. Ashok’s.”
          He is so pictorial in his description of the protagonist. Who plans his crime well in advance? His disgusting act of spitting repeatedly in the direction of his village could be a sign of final rejection of everything he holds dear, to escape from the Rooster Coop of misery.
          The positive features of Balram aren’t curious because he is the narrator of the story. Balram presents himself as an above average and smart boy who grows with his experiences and changed from anave, poor child to a hardened rich metropolitan. He looks with a cynical attitude a moral indignation at the conditions in India and at his own life. But at the end Balram is a lonely people. He is lonely because of his diving condition. But he is also lonely because he is dislocated from his comrades. He even keeps his nephews away from himself. Between them stands the deed which changes everything.
                   “One day, I know Dharma this boy who is drinking my milk and eating my ice cream in big bowls will ask me… And then I’ll have to come up with an answer or kill, I suppose.”
          His master’s murder will follow Balram every time, Even if he hopes to find the way back in community.
          Balram takes advantage of the limited knowledge of rural beliefs of the upper classes by making up signs of respect for various object or building like a sacred temple, statue, or tree. Balram however doesn’t take his religion too seriously.
          Religion plays a major role in an Indian’s life as it symbolized tradition and honor. This is revealed thought the marriage of Ashok and Rinky madam as Ashok’s father did not approve of their union because she wasn’t from the same religion or cast as him.
           Balram himself bears no grudges against Muslims. He even respects them and says that they are good people. He also sys for all Muslims;
           “Four greatest poets who have lived”
                    Balram’s behavior is also sympathy for all people more for poor. But he naver thinks more because to move on in the life not sees behind Himself. He all way thinking about present not sees his past.
           Balram know how to escape from being caught through corrupt means. He has got the roles reversed and justifies having masters like Ashok to enable white Tigers him to break out of the coop.
           “I think the Rooster Coop needs people like me to break out of it. It needs masters like Me Ashok- who for all his numerous virtues was not much of a master to be weeded out and exceptional servants like me to replace them… I have switched sides; I am now one of those who cannot be caught in India.                                                                                                                   I’ve made it! I’ve broken out of the Coop! I’ll never say I made a mistake that night in Delhi when I said my master’s throat.
          Alarm proves to be a psychopath with his hysterical lounger with which he concludes his story of success in blood, a very dangerous philosophy of life, which is nothing but that of terrorists, Adiga has created two psychopaths who will destroy our social logic. There seems to be play of sadomasochism with the co-occurrence of sadism and masochism in both Balram and Ashok.
“Neither you nor I speak English, but there are some things that can be said only in English”.
          Balram say about Indian people and how language play vital role in the society. In English he speaks about India and society. It is good because more people not understand it.
           “You were looking for the key for years but the door was always open”.
           We always wit for a time that we think that success came to me and we search for the key but we never know door was open that why we search for the key over life time. Life always gives to a signal but we don’t know about and search for the key.
           Many people are not doing anything in his life so better do a bad thing in your life so your life not wastes to the society.
          “Not doing anything, better to do bad thing”.
          Balram also represent of two India one is light and other part is dark sight of India. He also says half baked India. All people live like that way. Balram also give a “Big Bellies and the small Bellies” It means “India of Light and an India of Darkness”
          Balram born in Dark India but depends on self we live over all life in dark side and came out this Rooster Coop and become a gentleman.
          In the novel we see that Balram as a munna. And how it group and at the end he become an Entrepreneur. In his struggle and also hoe he thinks beyond his limitation and does the work.
           His strong think and do work at time it to he was become a big man and also become Entrepreneur.
           b

Thursday, 1 November 2012

Shri Aurobindo’s view on India Culture


Name: Joshi Toral

Paper: 4 Indian Writing in English

Topic: Shri Aurobindo’s view on India Culture

SEM: 3,

M.A. part 2.
Year: 2012


Submitted to,
Dr.Dilip Barad,
M.K Bhavnagar University,
Bhavnagar





·       Sri Aurobindo’s View of Indian Culture

·       Introduction:

     India is famous for the myth, heritage and culture. Hear also Aurobindo’s discuss about over religion, spirituality and culture.
      The old Hellenic or Greece Roman civilization perished, among other reasons, because it only imperfectly generalized culture in its own society and was surrounded by huge masses of humanity who were still possessed by the barbarian habit of mind. Civilization can never be safe so long, confining the cultured mentality to a small minority, it nourishes in its bosom a tremendous mass of ignorance, a multitude, a proletariat.

“Either knowledge must enlarge from above or be always in danger of submergence by the ignorant night from below”
Europe boasts of her science and its marvels. But to the braggart intellect of Europe the Indian is bound to reply,
“I am not interested in what you know; I am interested in what you are. With all your discoveries and inventions, what have you become? Your enlightenment is great—but what are these strange creatures that move about in the electric light you have installed and imagine that they are human?”
 Is it a great gain for the human intellect to have grown more acute and discerning, if the human soul dwindles? Man in Europe is descending steadily from the human level and approximating to the ant and the hornet. The process is not complete but it is progressing apace, and if nothing stops the debacle, we may hope to see its culmination in this twentieth century. After all our superstitions were better than this enlightenment, our social abuses less murderous to the hopes of the race than this social perfection.
Ninety years later, what was then behind the veil is now out in the open. We have almost reached the “culmination” of the West’s failure. It has failed in spite of all its achievements because it has ignored what we “are,” scoffed at what we are expected to “become.” And that is precisely, for Sri Aurobindo, the heart of Indian civilization, its constant concern through ages, in art or science or yoga, in every activity of life.
“The laboratory of the soul has been India,”
 Indian culture is simply the culture of man’s inner richness. It is a realization that the entire universe is divine, tree, bird, man and star—and our Mother Earth, whom the West has for two thousand years regarded as a chunk of inanimate matter created to serve our ever-expanding greed.
This great and ancient nation was once the fountain of human light, the apex of human civilization, the exemplar of courage and humanity, the perfection of good Government and settled society, the mother of all religions, the teacher of all wisdom and philosophy. It has suffered much at the hands of inferior civilizations and more savage peoples; it has gone down into the shadow of night and tasted often of the bitterness of death. Its pride has been trampled into the dust and its glory has departed.
Hunger and misery and despair have become the masters of this fair soil, these noble hills, these ancient rivers, these cities whose life story goes back into prehistoric night. All our calamities have been but a discipline of suffering, because for the great mission before us prosperity was not sufficient, adversity had also its training; to taste the glory of power and beneficence and joy was not sufficient, the knowledge of weakness and torture and humiliation was also needed.
I have always laid a dominant stress and I now lay an entire stress on the spiritual life, but my idea of spirituality has nothing to do with ascetic withdrawal or contempt or disgust of secular things. There is to me nothing secular, all human activity is for me a thing to be included in a complete spiritual life.
People care nothing about the spiritual basis of life which is India's real mission and the only possible source of her greatness, or give to it only a slight, secondary or incidental value, a something that has to be stuck on as a sentiment or a bit of colouring matter. Our whole principle is different.
We are sometimes asked what on earth we mean by spirituality in art and poetry or in political and social life—a confession of ignorance strange enough in any Indian mouth at this stage of our national history. We have here really an echo of the European idea that religion and spirituality on the one side and intellectual activity and practical life on the other are two entirely different things and have each to be pursued on its own entirely separate lines and in obedience to its own entirely separate principles. True spirituality rejects no new light, no added means or materials of our human self-development. It means simply to keep our center, our essential way of being, and our inborn nature and assimilate to it all we receive, and evolve out of it all we do and create.
To achieve India’s “renaissance,” Sri Aurobindo boldly and repeatedly called on his countrymen to develop the Kshatriya spirit, almost lost after centuries of subjection:
The Kshatriya of old must again take his rightful position in our social polity to discharge the first and foremost duty of defending its interests. The brain is impotent without the right arm of strength.
 It is the education which starting with the past and making full use of the present builds up a great nation. Whoever wishes to cut off the nation from its past is no friend of our national growth. Whoever fails to take advantage of the present is losing us the battle of life. We must therefore save for India that entire she has stored up of knowledge, character and noble thought in her immemorial past. We must acquire for her the best knowledge that Europe can give her and assimilate it to her own peculiar type of national temperament. We must introduce the best methods of teaching humanity has developed, whether modern or ancient. And all these we must harmonies into a system which will be impregnated with the spirit of self-reliance so as to build up men and not machines.
 “Mercenary and soulless education,”
 “I believe that the main cause of India's weakness,”
“Is not subjection, nor poverty, nor a lack of spirituality or Dharma, but a diminution of thought-power, the spread of ignorance in the motherland of Knowledge? Everywhere I see an inability or unwillingness to think.”
This is clearly not the line Indian education has taken. If we see today that nothing even of the Mahabharata or the Ramayana is taught to an Indian child, we can measure the abyss to be bridged. That the greatest epics of mankind should be thrown away on the absurd and erroneous pretext that they are “religious” is beyond the comprehension of an impartial observer. A German or French or English child will be taught something of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey, because they are regarded as the root of European culture, and somehow present in the European consciousness. He will not be asked to worship Zeus or Athena, but will be shown how the Ancients saw and experienced the world and the human being. But Indian epics, a hundred times richer and vaster in human experience, a thousand times more present in the Indian consciousness, will not be taught to an Indian child. Not to speak of other important texts such as the beautiful Tamil epics, Shilappadikaram and Manimekhalai. Even the Panchatantra and countless other highly educational collections of Indian stories—even folk stories—are ruled out.
It would be a tragic irony of fate if India were to throw away her spiritual heritage at the very her spiritual heritage at the very moment when in the rest of the world there is more and more a turning towards her for spiritual help and a saving light. This must not will surely not happen; but it can’t be said that the danger is not there are indeed other numerous and difficult problems that country or will very soon face it.