Name: Joshi Toral
Paper: E-c-203: Literay Criticiam:
Western&Indian Poetics-2
Topic: Explaining the Definition of Deconstruction by Derrida
SEM: 1, part 2.
Year: 2011-2012
Submitted to,
Dr.Dilip Barad,
Bhavnagar University,
Bhavnagar
Deconstruction
·
What is deconstruction?
Although the French philosopher
teaches Derrida’s did not invent the term deconstruction. He found lectionary.
It was an absolute and archaic need when he first started to used it in the
1960s wooly Allen’s Deconstructing Harry as in academic Jamul. The moue fawns our
the urbane Parisian as the man who as the tag time put it, world change not
just the way you think about addicting, but every thing about the way think.
Deconstruction is sometimes used as a lobed For Clinical correlation and
further evaluation what literary studies in general do to poems. Play and
novels broking them dream to see how they work the implication often being that
as for the child who takes apart their new days on their birthday meaning. It may not proud passable to put think back together
again. Derrida’s influxes in literary studies have been extremely
controversial.
· Deconstruction:
Deconstruction
resist easy summary. This is Patty because of the breath of Derriere’s
interests and Portly because Derides philosophical inspirations come from a traditional
and idiom alien to most academic philosopher in Britain and the United states.
Let alone to students and professors of literary studies,
Deconstruction it should already be day is look would,
suspiciris world and
Prominently away of the
traditional philosophical interest in essences, ideas and abstract logics. It
also recognizes the necessity of asking the kinds of auctions which can only be
proved philosophically. As Derrida commented in an intrnieag 1968.
‘Derrida’s idea of ‘ghost’
.
· Deconstruction
and writing:
Derrida’s reuse of the concept of writing. Derrida’s
essay “ Signature event context” (1972) address the difference between written
and spoken communication, traditionally distinguished by philosophy- and by
common sense- in terms of absence and presence. It seems natural to us that
speaking should seem more spontaneous, more immediate, than writing and
philosophy, underpinned by the same metaphysical assumptions, has tried to show
that because writing can function in the absence of either the sender of a
message or its receiver, is a secondary, dative from of oral communication.
For Levi-Strauss in example analyzed at length in of
grammatology the power of writing as a technology of communication comes at a
cost.
“Derrida
argues in his book the post card: From Socrates to Freud and Bayous (1980).
It doesn’t mean that no latter ever arrives or that
nothing makes sense- merely that For Clinical correlation and further
evaluation there to be communication, there must be the structural possibility
of misunderstanding.
· Deconstruction,
literature and philosophy.
There are two issues both involve philosophy again.
1 Literary theory
and criticism which like all our systems of interpretations and understandings,
deepens on philosophical or metaphysical
Assumptions are viler able to deconstruction’s critical side.
2 Literature has an important place in deconstruction’s critical
affirmative disruption of philosophy.
Deconstruction has been convened by the German
philosopher Jorgen Hagerman. For Clinical correlation and further evaluation
seeking to reduce philosophy to literature by denying there is such a thing as
truth. All philosophy becomes, like literature a mere word game. The American
philosopher Richard Retry says something similar, but he sees this as the
strength of deconstruction rather than its weakness of deconstruction has given
up on the outmoded dream of philosophy as a way of knowing the world.
· Literature
and truth:
There is unhappy with the attentive posed by philosophy,
and accepted by traditional and Romantic theories of literature, between truth
and falsehood, deconstruction has been accused of all kind of terrible things.
Much of the humor of
Oscar
Wild’s play. The importance of Being Earnest (1895).
Ex.
Depends on the comic inversion of the usual ways we interpret the world, ways
which are consistent with the underlying philosophical frame work that we have
been discussing hear.
Gwendoden remark:
In matters of grave importance, style, not sincerity
is the vital things.
The entire play stages and
re-stages this upheaval as a perplexing of front to common an earnest nature,
as it a name expresses some essential attribute of that to which it refers.
But reminds us that there is
really no difference between being earnest and being called: Ernest, between
being true and simulating truth, at least in world where people believe that
names actually ‘mean’ something.
We laugh at Lady Cracknel’s sudden change of
heart regarding Cecily’s suitability as a bride For Clinical correlation and
further evaluation her nephew when she hears of her fortune, it is not because
such fickleness is not unheard of, but because it is all too familiar.
The Victorian writer “Thomas
Carlyle’s” extraordinary work sartor- Resartus (1831) raises similar problems.
.
· Deconstruction
and Post Structuralism:
Because it refuses not only
philosophical but historical determnalism in the process affirm that
deconstruction in the sense of inerrability or resistance, is at work there. The
way we organized our experience of temporality in terms or past, present and
future is a major target of deconstruction, so to approach Derrida’s work in
terms of its precursors will always be some what misleading.
Two most common strategies For Clinical
correlation and further evaluation appropriating deconstruction by tying it to
a particular set of influences: Specifically as the successor of structuralism
and in a border sense as one of the modernist critics of the enlightenment.
“The Language of criticism” and “The
séances of man”.
Published under that title in 1968. Although by the
1970 edition the book’s subtitle had taken presence.
“The
structuralist controversy”
Deconstruction has deurlopred out of insights
originally made by structuralist.
The label “post –structuralist” is
often applied to Derrida such as the critic Roland Barters’ and the historian
Michel Foucault- Derrida had never proclaimed any allegiance to ‘Structuralism’.
Hello Toral,
ReplyDeleteYour language deconstructs my ideas about you as a student. Your blog article is scholarly. It is difficult to understand your writing for a common reader like me, so could you please summarize your views in few lines? Thank you in advance.
That's true, Parth, Because I am now following all friends way of writing. It should not be literal copy or summary. so i have written systematically and with logical ideas. so it sounds like scholarly but apparently not true.
DeleteThank you............
Hey Toral,
ReplyDeleteIf you put example in your blog so that we can easily understand it.but overall it was nice.Thank You...
thank you....
Delete